May Bonus Review #1

8733324Published by: Icon Books UK

Publication Date: 1st February 2011 (First published 1st February 2005)

I.S.B.N.: 9781848312203

Format: Paperback

Price: £8.99

 

 

 

 

Blurb

A vehement attack on the latest pseudo-scientific claims about the differences between the sexes. Sex discrimination is supposedly a distant memory. Yet popular books, magazines and even scientific articles increasingly defend inequalities by citing immutable biological differences between the male and female brain. That’s the reason, we’re told, that there are so few women in science and engineering, so few men in the laundry room – different brains are just better suited to different things. Drawing on the latest research in developmental psychology, neuroscience, and social psychology, Delusions of Gender powerfully rebuts these claims, showing how old myths, dressed up in new scientific finery, are helping perpetuate the sexist status quo. Cordelia Fine, ‘a cognitive neuroscientist with a sharp sense of humour and an intelligent sense of reality’ (The Times) reveals the mind’s remarkable plasticity, shows how profoundly culture influences the way we think about ourselves and, ultimately, exposes just how much of what we consider ‘hardwired’ is actually malleable.

I ordered this edition because you can get her other two books Testosterone Rex and A Mind of Its Own in matching covers, and I think they’d look rather good on my shelves, so there *sticks tongue out, blows raspberries*.

My Review

An excellent introduction to the problem of trying to find sex differences with neuroscience. Despite efforts by some individuals to shore up their misogyny with neuroscience, Fine demolishes their arguments by taking a close look at the studies and reporting back in an accessible manner the actual findings of studies, along with any short comings and possible biases. There are so many, and they’ve found their way into popular science books and articles. And she’s very funny with it.

She goes on to cover childhood and gendered behaviour. Surprise, surprise, if children see mummy doing all the housework and childcare, they believe mummies are meant to do all the housework. And wear pink. I hate pink. Kids are sponges, even if you try to block out gender roles in your own household they’ll pick it up from the telly and playgroup. And then reinforce them to others. 

This book is easy to read and backs up it’s claims with references.

Totally recommend this one.

5/5

3 thoughts on “May Bonus Review #1

    1. Until the late 19th century all children wore white dresses until the age of five or so. Then it changed to boys wearing pink, because it was a shade of red, and blue was for girls because it was thought of as calm and a symbol of purity, at the beginning of the 20th century. There was a determined effort to teach gender to children, to make sure they followed the gender norms of the day, because they were worried about the ‘effeminacy of society’. It was only in the middle of the 20th century that it changed to pink for girls/blue for boys. It’s such a transient fashion, rather than any ingrained/hardwired preference. Wear pink and enjoy it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s